Plate Tectonics

How the Theory of Plate Tectonics Developed

Plate Tectonics
Flow of matter & energy in the Earth
The Earth's Interior
Geoscientists observations
How the Theory of Plate Tectonics Developed

eduardsuess.jpg

Theories of Suess

In the late 1800s there were two features of Earth that led to the development of the theory of plate tectonics. The geologist Eduard Suess tried to solve how mountain ranges form. He said that during the cooling of earth from a molten state caused the more dense materials to sink toward the center, and the less dense materials to float and form the crust. From this he speculated that mountain ranges were formed from the contraction and cooling of Earth. He then went on to try and explain the origins of the oceans, continents, and the similarities of fossils found on separate continents. He made a model where, during the cooling process, parts of Earth could sink deeper than others, forming ocean basins. He said that parts of the sea floor along with continents  could rise and sink as the Earth cooled. This led him to propose the idea of land bridges between continents. He invented the term Gondwanaland to describe a continent made up of cantral and southern Africa, Madaascar, and peninsular India. All of these locations had similar fossils that were hundreds of millions of years old.  Suess said that these land bridges allowed for animals to  go to different areas without crossing the ocean.

pangea.gif

Pangea

Wegener stated that 200 million years ago there was a super continent known as Pangea, the Greek word for land. He said that this continent then went on to break into separate continents that then moved apart. He said that compression at the leading edge of a moving continent was the cause of the formation of mountains.These hypothesis allowed Wegener to explain the varying ages of different mountain belts. He said that the timing of the breakup was a factor, with some parts separating earlier than others. his evidence included similar rocks and fossils found on separate continents, and allowed for the sense of the continents fitting together like a puzzle.

reconstructingpangea.gif

Reconstructing

225 million years ago is only a small fraction of Earth's history. There might be rocks around you that are older. The positions of the continents before 225 million years ago can also be reconstructed using the same type of evidence for reconstructing Pangea, only it is extremely more difficult. The oldest oceanic crust geologists have discovered is only 200 million years old. Therefore evidence for the earlier positions must be obtained from the continents themselves. Old mountain belts help in the location of ancient collision zones. Fossils and rock types also provide evidence for locations of ancient seas, glaciers, mountains, and ecological regions. Continents like Pangea are known as super continents, and geoscientists believe that there was one one before Pangea. The cycle of the breakup and reassembly of continents is known as the Wilson Cycle.

a-wegener.jpg

 Theories of Wegener

The German geoscientist, Alfred Wegener, proposed the idea of continental drift in 1912. He said there was many problems with the contraction theory. one of these problems was the compression of the Alps. The rock layers in the Alps extremely folded and stacked on top of each other, showing a horizontal shortening of the original distances. Wegener did not believe that contraction could cause such shortening. He also theorized that contraction should form uniform wrinklies in the Earth, not these narrow zones of folding. Radioactive heat's discovery provided evidence against cooling. The heat caused by radioactive decay would work against the process of cooling and contracting.

Accepting Wegener's Theories

 Reactions to Wegener's ideas were mixed. Some accepted his evidence, while others argued that there was no way continents could "plow through" the ocean floor. Many geoscientists rejected his theories. In 1926 there was an international meeting held, devoted to discussion of continental drift.Wegener's evidence for the drift was strong, but the mechanism he proposed for it was weak. People finally started to become convinced of continental drift  by World War II. The sea floor was explored, and then mapped extensively. By the 1960s the theory of plate tectonics had been developed. There is so much evidence to support plate tectonics, that most geoscientists accept the theory today.

paleomagneticstrip.gif

Paleomagnetism

Geoscientists collect rocks containing magnetite, and measure the past magnetism. This past magnetism is known as paleomagnetism. They put a sample in a special room arranged so that Earth's present magnetic field is canceled out. The magnetic field of Earth has the same pattern that would be observed as if it were a giant bar magnet inside Earth. It is believed that Earth's magnetic field is caused by the movements of liquid iron in Earth's core. The angle that the magnetic field lines make with Earth's surface changes from the equator to the poles. The lines are nearly horizontal near the equator, and almost vertical near the poles. Paleomagnetism of a rock can tell you the latitude of a rock called the paleolatitude. Measurement of the paleolatitude is one thing geoscientists use to reconstruct past super continents. But there is no way to measure paleolongitude, because magnetic filed lines are always north-south.

400px-plate_tectonics_over_time.gif

How the Continents Move

Wegener thought that the material beneath the Litosphere acted like a slow-moving fluid. Other geologists thought that folded mountains were evidence of contraction, but Wegener thought they were evidence of horizontal compression caused by continents moving. These folded mountains convinced Wegener that the inner forces of Earth were powerful enough to move continents. A quote from Wegener explains how all the geological evidence allowed "fit together"; " It is just as if we were to refit the torn pieces of a newspaper by matching their edges and then check whether the lines of print run smoothly across. If they do, there is nothing left to conclude but that the pieces were in fact joined this way. if only one line was available to the test, we would still have found a high probability for the accuracy of the fit, but if we have n number of lines, this probability is raised to the nth power."

ground.jpg

Using Evidence

Today evidence such as; magnetic striping on the ocean floor, ages of the ocean-floor basalts, outlines of continental plates, and the locations of similar fossils and rocks have allowed scientists to reconstruct the breakup of Pangea. It began to breakup 200 million years ago as continental rifts began to open, and oceanic crust was formed. Pangea continued to pulled apart, and oceanic crust was formed between the northern and southern continents. New ocean floor formed between  Antarctica and Australia and between Africa and South America. And India separated from Antarctica and traveled north.